Skip to content
CoreBlog

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Define President Trump's Political Legacy - as well as America's Position in the World

Following executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the state-building business.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president announced that US forces had effectively apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a team comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, orderly and judicious transition," he said.

What exactly "running the country" involves is ambiguous, but the vow marks an dramatic policy reversal for the president, full of inconsistencies and daunting challenges.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at overthrowing governments and who vowed to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now betting his presidency on successfully reconstructing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been undermined by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was unwaveringly upbeat.

He claimed his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no exception. He vowed to enlist American energy companies to rebuild Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, providing financing for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has reshaped Venezuela's future – for better or worse.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is more than willing to use military force internationally.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, suspected drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, militias in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to past actions, which have largely involved missiles and aircraft that reduce the exposure of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are notably distinct.

His goal, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That play on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra may be hard for some of Trump's backers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who split from the president after accusing him of abandoning his political base, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's never ending use of force and support of foreign wars is understandable because we are compelled to fund it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to retake confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "criminal regime" as "decisive and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US security policy, he said, was to "protect trade, territory and assets that are fundamental to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will provoke larger questions in global politics, however, and affect American ties with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement voicing shock and condemning what it said was a reckless attack on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar censures of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently seemed to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, voiced concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were sharper.

"America should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have understood by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and overthrow attempts that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's decision not to inform legislative leaders before launching the attack.

"Donald Trump has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and protect democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First requires."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" details of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with zero American casualties and minimal harm to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic bravado, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "one of the most stunning, effective and impressive demonstrations of American military might and competency in American history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that victory continuing, as the US says it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means is unclear. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for decades while stabilising a region that is sure to be cautious of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

About the author

Tara Craig

A tech journalist with over a decade of experience covering startups and digital transformation.

CoreBlog

Type to search articles.