🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that began as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves simple recognition of the bygone era when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but faced with the threats that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.