🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.